ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 128 of 297
« First < 2878118124125126127128 129130131132138178228 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>***OFFICIAL Patrick Mahomes GIF thread***
Hammock Parties 12:16 PM 08-13-2017
AKA GIF'D UP: Franchise QB Edition.

Complete with smooth, clean, CP-exclusive GIFs and bullshit analysis from the guy who stroked off Cassel.

2017: Preseason Game #1

2017: Preseason Game #2, Drive #1

2017: Preseason Game #2, Drive #2

2017: Preseason Game #3, Various plays in Posts 198-203

2017: Preseason Game #4, Various plays in Posts 292 and 294


THERE ARE NO BRAKES ON THIS TRAIN


[Reply]
DJ's left nut 12:03 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
Edit: Reminds me that I was talking with Bills Fan the other day and they were talking about the superior KC offense, outside of Mahomes. Literally any team in the NFL could have built that offense, as the only high pick was Fisher. It's not difficult to line up Cleveland cast-offs. It's not difficult to draft someone in rounds 3-5. The Chiefs simply did it correctly and, of course, dropped in the best possible engine to make it go.
I won't even concede "Outside of Mahomes"

The Chiefs moved up from 27, man. So anybody before 27 could've moved up. And the teams after 27 had more than enough draft capital to beat our offer. Some of them even had picks higher in the round.

Literally every single team in the NFL had an equal/better shot at Patrick Mahomes as the Chiefs. And they simply didn't get it done.

I'll never join the "Fuck Dorsey, I'm glad he's gone" crowd because he's the dude that put that trade with Buffalo together. He's the dude that knew right where he needed to be and made sure he went into that draft with the framework to get there already in place.

He did a spectacular job getting us into that position when nobody else did. And he transformed the franchise. It may have been Veach that sold the rest of the team on getting Mahomes but it was Dorsey that did the spade work to make sure they could have him. That deserves a TON of praise.
[Reply]
Hammock Parties 12:05 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
It may have been Veach that sold the rest of the team on getting Mahomes but it was Dorsey that did the spade work to make sure they could have him. That deserves a TON of praise.
He's the GM we deserve, but not the one we need.
[Reply]
O.city 12:06 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by WhiteWhale:
I thought it might be up there somewhere. Thanks for humoring my laziness.

Though I guess it was his drop that really impressed with. Excellent footwork. Good protection. You can really see him go through his reads in time with his feet. Montanaesque. Like he was dancing. The delivery is still awesome.

Montana didn't do that.
This is also where armstrength comes into play. He actually got to Watkins late as he was open for a bit earlier. But he's got such a howitzer, it didn't matter.
[Reply]
Sweet Daddy Hate 12:10 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
We need to continue to draft BPA to build the team. The Chiefs are who they are, right now, in large part due to a supporting cast including:

1) a third round TE
2) a third round RB
3) a fifth round WR
4) late-round/castoff OL

Hell, even the D was built through:

1) 2nd round DL
2) 2nd round DL
3) 2nd round OLB
4) 2nd round OLB
5) 3rd round OLB
6) various castoffs

If Veach is even near the same level as Dorsey, we're going to be good for a while.

Edit: Reminds me that I was talking with Bills Fan the other day and they were talking about the superior KC offense, outside of Mahomes. Literally any team in the NFL could have built that offense, as the only high pick was Fisher. It's not difficult to line up Cleveland cast-offs. It's not difficult to draft someone in rounds 3-5. The Chiefs simply did it correctly and, of course, dropped in the best possible engine to make it go.

Excellent points. We must consider and weigh how much of that drafting was based on software models, how much on long and short-term research, and how much on good, old fashioned instinct/table-banging.


I am curious as to how much( or little )Veach will incorporate from Dorsey's methods in to his own program. Dorsey's greatest strength was his unrelenting quest to overturn every possible rock to find hidden gems.
How much do we know already? What can we go on?
[Reply]
Sweet Daddy Hate 12:13 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
He's the GM we deserve, but not the one we need.

How so? Again, there were a LOT of things about Dorsey the scout that made him a great GM, and I'm not so convinced that Veach possesses those same qualities.
[Reply]
Pitt Gorilla 12:16 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
I won't even concede "Outside of Mahomes"

The Chiefs moved up from 27, man. So anybody before 27 could've moved up. And the teams after 27 had more than enough draft capital to beat our offer. Some of them even had picks higher in the round.

Literally every single team in the NFL had an equal/better shot at Patrick Mahomes as the Chiefs. And they simply didn't get it done.

I'll never join the "**** Dorsey, I'm glad he's gone" crowd because he's the dude that put that trade with Buffalo together. He's the dude that knew right where he needed to be and made sure he went into that draft with the framework to get there already in place.

He did a spectacular job getting us into that position when nobody else did. And he transformed the franchise. It may have been Veach that sold the rest of the team on getting Mahomes but it was Dorsey that did the spade work to make sure they could have him. That deserves a TON of praise.
Oh, I agree completely. I often point out that every other team, especially the Bills, could have drafted Mahomes, but chose not to. Even Denver had better draft capital to pull off a trade. My point was centered around the argument of "well, Mahomes would simply stink here because the Bills don't have the weapons that KC has." Usually, I pick apart that lunacy by pointing to how awesome Mahomes is on his own. This time, however, I was more focused on how KC didn't simply amass these weapons through high picks; KC is good because they drafted well in the later rounds by going BPA and I hope that continues.
[Reply]
Hammock Parties 12:18 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate:
How so? Again, there were a LOT of things about Dorsey the scout that made him a great GM, and I'm not so convinced that Veach possesses those same qualities.
The Cam Erving deal says otherwise.

Veach is our guy.
[Reply]
Pitt Gorilla 12:19 PM 11-07-2018
Also understand that this team is where it is, in part, to a WR that Chief Fan didn't want on the team. How many teams do you think wish they had taken Reek in the 5th? How many would give up a first for him right now?

THAT is the hallmark of being a good GM that fully understands that his fans are complete idiots.
[Reply]
Sweet Daddy Hate 12:27 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
The Cam Erving deal says otherwise.

Veach is our guy.

Eh, body of work and give me a couple of drafts with all picks present and accounted for before I make a further ruling.


Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
Also understand that this team is where it is, in part, to a WR that Chief Fan didn't want on the team. How many teams do you think wish they had taken Reek in the 5th? How many would give up a first for him right now?

THAT is the hallmark of being a good GM that fully understands that his fans are complete idiots.

Damn straight.
[Reply]
DJ's left nut 12:33 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate:
How so? Again, there were a LOT of things about Dorsey the scout that made him a great GM, and I'm not so convinced that Veach possesses those same qualities.
I think we'll see a shift away from pure measurables and SPARQ scores; fewer combine warriors, perhaps. There will be some positives to take from that, but there will be some negatives as well.

Veach will take Speaks and his higher floor over K-Pass and his higher ceiling and sometimes that will work out better for us. But Veach may also be less inclined to gamble on Kelce or Hill; may not be as likely to take an LDT.

I'll concede that Dorsey approached the draft a little too 'scout heavy' at times. He got a little too drooly with guys who could turn into stars if 20 different things broke right and maybe looked past some basic immediate team-building considerations. But g'damn did he have an eye for those gems and there's an argument to be made that it made the rest of the quibbles worth it.

I still wouldn't have fired him. He deserved the opportunity to see it through with this team and I see no reason to believe he couldn't have done a great job going forward.
[Reply]
O.city 12:36 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
I think we'll see a shift away from pure measurables and SPARQ scores; fewer combine warriors, perhaps. There will be some positives to take from that, but there will be some negatives as well.

Veach will take Speaks and his higher floor over K-Pass and his higher ceiling and sometimes that will work out better for us. But Veach may also be less inclined to gamble on Kelce or Hill; may not be as likely to take an LDT.

I'll concede that Dorsey approached the draft a little too 'scout heavy' at times. He got a little too drooly with guys who could turn into stars if 20 different things broke right and maybe looked past some basic immediate team-building considerations. But g'damn did he have an eye for those gems and there's an argument to be made that it made the rest of the quibbles worth it.

I still wouldn't have fired him. He deserved the opportunity to see it through with this team and I see no reason to believe he couldn't have done a great job going forward.
Middlekauf talked about him quite a bit recently on his podcasts. Apparently he had an ego problem and didn't get along with many people in KC.

Seemed pretty grain of salt for me though so who knows.
[Reply]
Sweet Daddy Hate 12:44 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
But Veach may also be less inclined to gamble on Kelce or Hill; may not be as likely to take an LDT.

Really?? Nah. I'm pretty sure if you've got Tyreek sitting there after you have done your due diligence, you're sending his name to the podium. I say that because in HIS case it's no so much a "gamble" as it is some extra PR work and Alka-Seltzer if need be.



Again, we just have to wait and see. Only time can answer these questions.
[Reply]
MahomesMagic 01:03 PM 11-07-2018
GM's often get too much credit or blame. NFL teams build up great scouting staffs. Dorsey certainly had an eye for talent but so does Veach. The great thing is there are still guys in KC than can do that (although we have been raided a bunch for scouts).
[Reply]
allen_kcCard 01:12 PM 11-07-2018
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
We need to continue to draft BPA to build the team. The Chiefs are who they are, right now, in large part due to a supporting cast including:

1) a third round TE
2) a third round RB
3) a fifth round WR
4) late-round/castoff OL

Hell, even the D was built through:

1) 2nd round DL
2) 2nd round DL
3) 2nd round OLB
4) 2nd round OLB
5) 3rd round OLB
6) various castoffs

If Veach is even near the same level as Dorsey, we're going to be good for a while.

Edit: Reminds me that I was talking with Bills Fan the other day and they were talking about the superior KC offense, outside of Mahomes. Literally any team in the NFL could have built that offense, as the only high pick was Fisher. It's not difficult to line up Cleveland cast-offs. It's not difficult to draft someone in rounds 3-5. The Chiefs simply did it correctly and, of course, dropped in the best possible engine to make it go.
I would say BPA with a generous slant toward defense.
[Reply]
RunKC 01:19 PM 11-07-2018


This is it. Maybe it’s just the style and way he throws it, but no other QB in the league can just turn on a dime with their whole body like that, especially running to the left..
[Reply]
Page 128 of 297
« First < 2878118124125126127128 129130131132138178228 > Last »
Up