Those are all bullshit excuses mumbled out just to pimp a dumb, shit safety that blows coverages EVERY week :-) What didn't help your cause.

Denver is a less talented version of the Eagles.
[Reply]

A desperate Giants team is not a good matchup for them. A few more Semen picks...
[Reply]

Oh - I know. I bet they win their first game in Denver, with a 4th quarter comeback. And then it will be time for Denver to hit the road. Uh oh....
[Reply]

Denver looks awful in the 4th this year. That's where their shit coaching staff really shows. Not good for them that it's happened at Pile High mostly too.
[Reply]

.@Broncos @jcharles25 with a lotta hop left in his step #Baldybreakdowns pic.twitter.com/Fg7ee1YrNJ

— Brian Baldinger (@BaldyNFL) October 3, 2017

.@Broncos @cjandersonb22 gets loose as they "dust off" the ole' wham block and @DomataPeko gets excited on sidelines #Baldybreakdowns pic.twitter.com/xwk3CYPPKw

— Brian Baldinger (@BaldyNFL) October 3, 2017

:-)
[Reply]

.@Broncos @DomataPeko anchors this rebuilt defense and it might be better than ever. #Baldybreakdowns pic.twitter.com/Vk1pkfyafN

— Brian Baldinger (@BaldyNFL) October 3, 2017

:-)
[Reply]

I already told you how this season will play out. Stop referencing early season pile high fools gold bullshit. This happens EVERY damn year.
[Reply]

I think the 24/7 pissing matches with QJ have killed visiting this place for me...

just sucks the life right out of ya.
[Reply]

Got any video on the cheap shot on Carr?
[Reply]

Cheap?

[Reply]

Peko has been a great signing for Denver . Really fits well.
[Reply]

(Pssst - that wasn't aimed towards you)
[Reply]

IDK--it can be kinda fun to watch a few retarded kids fight each other every now and again.

I mean, "cheap pile high air," where else are you going to get that sort of prose laden with such clever puns?
[Reply]

Week 4's adjusted completion % leaders pic.twitter.com/JqRydIo8i5

— Pro Football Focus (@PFF) October 3, 2017

:-)
[Reply]

179 yards and 1 TD against an Oakland defense without Amerson and Conley

:-)
[Reply]