Originally Posted by jjchieffan:
Didn't watch. Did VonDouchebag break his sackless streak? I'm pretty sure that the guys on our defense that KnowShit and Kramzitinhisrectum have been ragging on have more sacks than VonDouchebag this season.
Got two... was so close to several others in the second half. [Reply]
You can clap all you want...but the circumstances were almost identical. New system with no film... early home games. They even iced the kicker in both openers to barely win...
Chargers look like a dumpster fire...Eagles look like the best team in the NFC East... [Reply]
News on Bolles getting better & better Can it improve more? Didn't see anything significant on video Never judge by cart or player reaction https://t.co/zckmZoRUkT
Originally Posted by gunns:
And? Denver scored 31 pts in game two 2 years ago....of course the first two games were at home also. See a pattern....uh, no. :rollseyes:
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
You can clap all you want...but the circumstances were almost identical. New system with no film... early home games. They even iced the kicker in both openers to barely win...
Chargers look like a dumpster fire...Eagles look like the best team in the NFC East...
Phhhtt.. Eagles were a below .500 team in 2016. Just using your logic. Or has that changed in the last week? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Phhhtt.. Eagles were a below .500 team in 2016. Just using your logic. Or has that changed in the last week?
My logic is Denver has the thin air and new coordinators...they went 6-2 last year in the first half. Their o-line is still bad....and played against back-up CBs today. Take Talib/Harris off your defense...and start your 4/5 defensive backs.
It was a good win...but was it as impressive as it seemed? Watson is going to get Semen hurt...like last year.
As I've said...Semen started with a 146 QBR through 3 games last year...which is better than where he is at now.
He does look like he's using his 3rd WR and TE more...but DC will adjust for that new wrinkle McCoy has brought. [Reply]