Yes, please… to both.
[Reply]

Rickey is very, very legit

Ridley is interesting given he just signed a deal but I guess you’d probably wanna do the same with Johnson
[Reply]

Also said the Steelers are trading for Mike Williams.
[Reply]

Not sure if that’s the real Rickey though
[Reply]

Trade for Ridley, sign MVS, dump Skyy Less, win another Super Bowl.

Sounds good.
[Reply]

Ridley turns 30 in December and just got paid so I’m a little hesitant right now to believe that’s real

Just would not go with Veach’s track record at all
[Reply]

Had a chance to sign him for just $ and no draft capital, now gonna give a pick?
[Reply]

Well, that was before Hollywood and Rice got knocked out for the year

But maybe to your point, no it does not seem Veachy to go after an expensive 30 y/o receiver
[Reply]

Question: Calvin Ridley’s cap hits are:

2024-$10 million
2025-$28 million
2026-$26.75 million
2027-$27.25 million

A post June 1 trade says they have $20 million in dead money ($5 million each year).

So that basically means his cap hits would be $5 million less each year for us correct?
[Reply]

It would be whatever his base salaries are I think
[Reply]

Just looked. It would basically be the same. Low $20 million cap hits for him starting next year.

So a steal considering the market. Would still want Diontae tho
[Reply]

"Chiefs are interested in trading for Justin Jefferson or Jamaar Chase"

-OTW15

That's how stupid the Ridley part of that tweet is.
[Reply]

I’d do Diontae first for sure and I think regardless of if that Rickey is fake, it’s still very plausible

Pay him for the next 2-3 years while Rice and Worthy are on rookie deals
[Reply]

The Dionte piece is very plausible.

Including Ridley is a missing chromosomes type comment.
[Reply]

Diontae Johnson was seemingly the Chiefs preferred WR choice this offseason, and Hollywood was Plan B… ironic that the Chiefs could be in a position to get their originally preferred option.
[Reply]