It wasn't the worst episode, and it wasn't some new benchmark in the golden age of television either
It was a necessary but cliched episode with few crucially intriguing tweaks rooted in the larger narrativbe . It was beautifully shot and well acted. It was a perfectly timed respite in the plot/action [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
It wasn't the worst episode, and it wasn't some new benchmark in the golden age of television either
It was a necessary but cliched episode with few crucially intriguing tweaks rooted in the larger narrativbe . It was beautifully shot and well acted. It was a perfectly timed respite in the plot/action
I could just as easily have;
skipped it,
had someone tell me the gist of what happened in the episode,
replied 'I figured it was something like that,'
and went on with life without having really missed anything. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
It wasn't the worst episode, and it wasn't some new benchmark in the golden age of television either
It was a necessary but cliched episode with few crucially intriguing tweaks rooted in the larger narrativbe . It was beautifully shot and well acted. It was a perfectly timed respite in the plot/action
what the narrativbe?
I didn't mind it as I really liked the Morgan character (until he started action like a douche)....so they are explaining why he's acting so uber fucking stupid.
but...pretty funny they left us hanging on what up with Glen.
kinda mean. hahaha [Reply]
Originally Posted by frankotank:
what the narrativbe?
I didn't mind it as I really liked the Morgan character (until he started action like a douche)....so they are explaining why he's acting so uber ****ing stupid.
but...pretty funny they left us hanging on what up with Glen.
kinda mean. hahaha