Yay! I can't believe Veach got my dude. I didn't want Veach to break the bank on all the shit OTs in this FA class but rather take a chance on this kid developing. Honestly, it also still leaves the draft open to taking an LT if they want and maybe developing that kid for a year. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kccrow:
Yay! I can't believe Veach got my dude. I didn't want Veach to break the bank on all the shit OTs in this FA class but rather take a chance on this kid developing. Honestly, it also still leaves the draft open to taking an LT if they want and maybe developing that kid for a year.
Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief:
I don’t necessarily mind Moore, but I’d feel much more comfortable if Thuney was still penciled in at left guard
Then you would or some would be complaining about not signing Bolton and or Trey. We are in the "established" phase of the Mahomes years, It's going to be this way until he retires. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
Then you would or some would be complaining about not signing Bolton and or Trey. We are in the "established" phase of the Mahomes years, It's going to be this way until he retires.
I get it, I just think it’s being a little reckless if this was their plan. They must have a lot of faith in Kingsley to play LG, that’s all I can say. This is the kind of situation that could really wreck a season if it doesn’t work out. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Wisconsin_Chief:
They absolutely should be trying to.
I'd definitely be up for Humphries hanging around as well, anyone know if he has the chops to play RT and could compete for the position with our $20M "penalties 'R' us" man J. Taylor? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Stryker:
Love this! I am very happy with what this team is doing leading up to the draft! Yes, I am all onboard with Simmons if he is within reach. :-)
Me too.
Simmons has Pro Bowl LT potential if medically cleared. [Reply]