Originally Posted by penchief:
No kidding? Are you so dense that you can't figure out that I rearranged the letters in your handle and added an ess to come up with "shitsmack?"
Second, just like you did with mine, merge those other threads under the thread title that pleases YOU, okay?
So referring to me and "shitsmack" in the same sentence, as if we are 2 different people is part of your schtick? You're a fuggin genious.
The threads are merged, and I used a title that please me just fine. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Look, I'm done trying to explain this to you. I KNOW what I did, and it's in the logs for the other mods to see.
The "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS" thread you saw was in the process of being merged. The first thread I merged was not yours, which is why both existed simultaneously.
Of course, you don't know this, because you're not a mod and you DON'T HAVE A ****ING CLUE how this software works. Because if you did, you'd know that you can only merge TWO THREADS AT A TIME. That means to merge 6 threads, I had to go through the process 5 separate times, resulting in the parody threads AS WELL AS the merged thread existing simultaneously.
4 of the 6 threads I merged had only 1 post - the starter - including yours. The other two had only a handful of posts. As for the other posts being out there, I'm going to merge them right now since you're such a ****ing pussy about it.
This isn't about the integrity of the forum, this is about you being righteously indignant for no ****ing reason at all.
Okay, since you condensed "ALL" of those threads under one thread title, why did you use YOUR thread title instead of mine when the only posts on that thread were in response to my thread title?
Why didn't you condense all of those threads and attribute them to you?
That is my point. Understand?
It is dishonest to do what you did, IMO. Let alone the fact that you didn't condense more than just two threads (if that) even though you claim to have done so.
If it was a mistake, I can accept that but don't try to make me look like I'm being unreasonable. I feel like it was your intent to enhance your own prestige by using your mod powers to fuch with someone whose opinion you resent or disagree with. [Reply]
Hey, pen, I stole your poopy pants. I can't hide my secret any longer.
If you want them back, send $10,000 in unmarked bills to the corner of 5th and Main in a black duffel bag with white straps. Put it in the green trash can. [Reply]
Wow. Dude - when threads are merged mods are given the option to change the title. The thread starter then appears to be the individual who started the oldest thread being merged. That just happened to be you in this case. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Brock:
Good lord, penchief, are you really this big a pussy? :-)
Good lord, Brock. If I were as big a pussy as you suggest, I would have already folded my tent and gone home instead of arguing the point.
The point is that no matter how offensive you or anyone else can be, there are standards of conduct. Only when those of us who believe in those standards strongly enough are willing to go "toe to toe" with the posers that try to intimidate through insult, will we ever be able to break the ice.
Can I physically kick your ass? Without a doubt.
Does it matter? No.
What matters it that people understand that kicking others to the curb is not the way. Getting people to join you in treating humanity with respect and the understanding of personal responsibility is the key to making the world a better place.
Originally Posted by penchief:
Okay, since you condensed "ALL" of those threads under one thread title, why did you use YOUR thread title instead of mine when the only posts on that thread were in response to my thread title?
Why didn't you condense all of those threads and attribute them to you?
That is my point. Understand?
It is dishonest to do what you did, IMO. Let alone the fact that you didn't condense more than just two threads (if that) even though you claim to have done so.
If it was a mistake, I can accept that but don't try to make me look like I'm being unreasonable. I feel like it was your intent to enhance your own prestige by using your mod powers to fuch with someone whose opinion you resent or disagree with.
I did not use MY thread title, because I didn't start a thread. I named a merged thread. Of course, you don't understand.
I find it funny, ironic, and pathetic that you started an entirely new thread to find out WHO changed your thread title because you didn't know, but at the same time you accuse me of attributing those other threads to myself. If I were taking credit for them, don't you think you'd KNOW who changed your thread?
You don't KNOW what the facts are, the rest of the mods do. It's in the logs. I can rest easy knowing that the other mods are honest and fair, while you continue to act like an ass.
Enhance my prestige? Give me a ****ing break. I merged SPAM threads after several people complained.
But by all means, if you want to continue talking out of your ass, go ahead. I'm quite certain at least 100 people have seen this thread and now think much less of you than they did before. One post in this thread has garnered me more rep than any other single post I've ever made. [Reply]
Originally Posted by penchief:
Good lord, Brock. If I were as big a pussy as you suggest, I would have already folded my tent and gone home instead of arguing the point.
The point is that no matter how offensive you or anyone else can be, there are standards of conduct. Only when those of us who believe in those standards strongly enough are willing to go "toe to toe" with the posers that try to intimidate through insult, will we ever be able to break the ice.
Can I physically kick your ass? Without a doubt.
Does it matter? No.
What matters it that people understand that kicking others to the curb is not the way . Getting people to join you in treating humanity with respect understanding their personal responsibility is the key to making the world a better place.
