Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Likely 111 yds 1 TD
Gesicki 7 rec 91 yds
Pitts 2 rec 59 yds
Bowers went 5/5 52 yds without an actual QB
Kittle had 92 yds
C. Otton went 8 rec 77 yds 1 TD
Point being, when the other team has an actual QB, their TE usually has a good day. And once when they didn't have a good QB.
Now, I'm not really scared Knox is going to go off or something. But he will probably have a decent day for himself, because BUF has a real live top-3 QB throwing the ball to him.
Kittle and Bowers are elite.
Otton looks like he might be in that next tier, which Pitts is in as well. Likely would probably be at least in that tier if Andrews weren't in front of him.
Gesicki has had some monster games this year.
Knox isn't better than a single guy you just mentioned, but ok. Sure, he could have a "decent" game.
But why do you keep ignoring the original point? Nothing you've said or pointed to changes the fact that he isn't better than Kincaid, and he doesn't kill us every year. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Kittle and Bowers are elite.
Otton looks like he might be in that next tier, which Pitts is in as well. Likely would probably be at least in that tier if Andrews weren't in front of him.
Gesicki has had some monster games this year.
Knox isn't better than a single guy you just mentioned, but ok. Sure, he could have a "decent" game.
But why do you keep ignoring the original point? Nothing you've said or pointed to changes the fact that he isn't better than Kincaid, and he doesn't kill us every year.
When did I say Knox was better than Kincaid or that "he kills us every year"? Because I know I didn't say either of those things. All I said was he probably would have a decent day "for himself," as in in terms of his average performance, that's it.
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
When did I say Knox was better than Kincaid or that "he kills us every year"? Because I know I didn't say either of those things. All I said was he probably would have a decent day "for himself," as in in terms of his average performance, that's it.
Don't put words in my mouth.
No dipshit, I said it, and you responded as if there was disagreement with what I said.
Originally Posted by staylor26:
No, it was literally just one game, and it had more to do with Sorenson than anything. Knox is not better than Kincaid.
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Meh. We don't cover TEs very well. Knox is going to have a decent game. Just hope he doesn't have a career one.
I made 2 points, and you responded with "meh" as if you disagreed. Do you get it yet? [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
No dipshit, I said it, and you responded as if there was disagreement with what I said.
I made 2 points, and you responded with "meh" as if you disagreed. Do you get it yet?
DO you get that I never said either that Knox was better than Kincaid or that he 'tore us up every year'? That all I said was he was probably going to have a good day?
Don't get pissy with me because someone else pushed your buttons, bub. Go have a fit at them. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
DO you get that I never said either that Knox was better than Kincaid or that he 'tore us up every year'? That all I said was he was probably going to have a good day?
Don't get pissy with me because someone else pushed your buttons, bub. Go have a fit at them.
Dude, you literally posted this:
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Meh. We don't cover TEs very well. Knox is going to have a decent game. Just hope he doesn't have a career one.
Immediately after I posted this:
QUOTE=staylor26;17806361]No, it was literally just one game, and it had more to do with Sorenson than anything. Knox is not better than Kincaid.[/QUOTE] [Reply]