Originally Posted by Fansy the Famous Bard:
I'd go for a more 'Middle Out' approach to the algorithm, if it were me.
Yeah, it would get complicated quickly.
We'd probably need specific antagonist routines, which would get interesting when two antagonists are going at it.
There would be the "88 routine"... call everyone retarded 400 times, and whenever anyone says something intelligent, tangent into left field with other random arguments.
There's the "Classic CP" routine... default to black & white arguments where you automatically pigeonhole your opponent into the opposite, dumbest extreme possible to make your own argument look less retarded.
"Baby Lee" routine... angry, super passive aggressive wall of text arguments dating back a decade or older.
"Every Sentence Counts" routine... where you quote the person 80 times while breaking down a response; plays well with any of the routines above.
And then you'd throw those routines into CP randomness.... the hijack, the pile on, summarizing by meme, etc. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Bearcat:
Yeah, it would get complicated quickly.
We'd probably need specific antagonist routines, which would get interesting when two antagonists are going at it.
There would be the "88 routine"... call everyone reeruned 400 times, and whenever anyone says something intelligent, tangent into left field with other random arguments.
There's the "Classic CP" routine... default to black & white arguments where you automatically pigeonhole your opponent into the opposite, dumbest extreme possible to make your own argument look less reeruned.
"Baby Lee" routine... angry, super passive aggressive wall of text arguments dating back a decade or older.
"Every Sentence Counts" routine... where you quote the person 80 times while breaking down a response; plays well with any of the routines above.
And then you'd throw those routines into CP randomness.... the hijack, the pile on, summarizing by meme, etc.
And learn how to communicate in a CONCISE and coherent manner.
All of your posts are word salad messes.
I'll go ahead and add illiterate to your list of deficiencies.
Just keep telling yourself that a top 5 statistical qb, and one of the eras best defenses was in no way enough to expect Andy Reid to win a title before 20 years passed and landing the best player who ever lived.
Two coaches since Andy left the Eagles took their teams to superbowls in their second year's with the franchise with less than Andy was working with for over a half decade lmmfgdao.
Imagine holding this guy blameless for those squandered rosters.
Just change your username to FloridaAndyStan. [Reply]
These are the kinds of fans this thread is directed at. So spoiled they can't even enjoy wins at this point because they won by 3 points instead of 9. [Reply]
