ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 2 of 2
< 12
Nzoner's Game Room>Comet Tsuchinshan-Atlas
4th and Long 07:42 PM 10-14-2024
Anyone besides me out looking at this comet? Tonight and tomorrow night are supposed to be the best 2 nights to view it.

I had to fight with some city light pollution to my west so the photos didn't come out worth a crap. I'm going to a different location tomorrow night.


[Reply]
Ocotillo 11:21 PM 10-15-2024
Originally Posted by Third Eye:
It’s pretty cool, but it’s no Hale-Bopp.
Hale-Bopp was a pussy comet compared to Haley's.
[Reply]
4th and Long 08:51 AM Yesterday
Originally Posted by Ocotillo:
Hale-Bopp was a pussy comet compared to Haley's.
I've seen both and Halley's wasn't anywhere near as big or bright as Hale-Bopp. In fact, Halley's comet is way down the list in term of magnitude (brightness) compared to a lot of other comets.

Halley's comet had a magnitude of 2.4. For reference, the lower the number, the higher the magnitude of brightness.

Halley's Comet (1986): Magnitude 2.4


Hale-Bopp (1996): Magnitude -0.8


Comet McNaught (2007): Magnitude -5.5


Comet Ikeya-Seki (1965): Magnitude -10

[Reply]
Rain Man 06:58 PM Yesterday
I've never seen a comet and I can't see this one. I think it's behind some high-rises that are west of my house.
[Reply]
Third Eye 07:08 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by Rain Man:
I've never seen a comet and I can't see this one. I think it's behind some high-rises that are west of my house.
I’m gonna be honest and say that this is absolutely shocking to me. You seem like an intellectually curious fellow and Hale-Bopp was visible for a long time. It was also plainly visible, no binoculars or long exposure photography needed.
[Reply]
Ocotillo 10:54 PM Yesterday
Originally Posted by 4th and Long:

Hale-Bopp (1996): Magnitude -0.8
Hale-Bopp was 1997.
[Reply]
4th and Long 10:07 AM Today
Originally Posted by Ocotillo:
Hale-Bopp was 1997.
Hale–Bopp became visible to the naked eye in May 1996.
[Reply]
Rain Man 12:48 PM Today
Originally Posted by Third Eye:
I’m gonna be honest and say that this is absolutely shocking to me. You seem like an intellectually curious fellow and Hale-Bopp was visible for a long time. It was also plainly visible, no binoculars or long exposure photography needed.
Honestly, I'm kind of lazy about stuff like this, and I don't know why. I'm interested in things like comets and meteor showers, but I live in the middle of a big city, and I'd likely have to drive at least 45 minutes each way to get myself to any kind of view. So I inevitably shrug and say, "maybe next time".
[Reply]
4th and Long 01:23 PM Today
Originally Posted by Rain Man:
Honestly, I'm kind of lazy about stuff like this, and I don't know why. I'm interested in things like comets and meteor showers, but I live in the middle of a big city, and I'd likely have to drive at least 45 minutes each way to get myself to any kind of view. So I inevitably shrug and say, "maybe next time".
If, after that 45 minute drive, you're not out in the middle of nowhere, where light pollution from the west is no longer visible on the horizon, you may as well stay at home. You won't be able to see anything.
[Reply]
Rain Man 01:32 PM Today
Originally Posted by 4th and Long:
If, after that 45 minute drive, you're not out in the middle of nowhere, where light pollution from the west is no longer visible on the horizon, you may as well stay at home. You won't be able to see anything.
If I drive 45 minutes east, then there'll be nothing east of me, but Denver west of me. So that's no good.

If I drive 45 minutes west, then I'd probably be close to the Continental Divide. I'd have a lot of dark west of me, but until I get to the top, the horizon is really, really close. If I drove to the top of the divide and then found a way to get off the highway, I bet I could get a really good view. But that's a pretty unpleasant drive that I usually try to avoid.
[Reply]
Page 2 of 2
< 12
Up