Originally Posted by KC_Connection:
Do you have any idea how ridiculous it would look to other fanbases to be crying like this about the best QB ever (during a 9-0 season coming off B2B SBs) because he missed a throw or two?
If Mahomes ever gets hurt again to the point he has to miss games (which unfortunately may happen with a turnstile like Kingsley at LT), I think some may be in for a rude awakening about how much he actually does out there and how much better even a subpar Mahomes is than practically every other QB in the sport.
Kelce admitted the ball n the endzone on his podcast the ball was catchable but his feet were messed up and he couldn’t get up for it . The worthy was a miss but not sure how easy it is to throw the ball 60 yards with wind is, I’m not making excuses for Pat but I mean some of theses guys trying to bury him kinda make me wonder if they are just miserable not matter what.
[Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
Has ANYONE said that?
Nobody - precisely nobody - wants Mahomes traded or benched. Not seriously anyway (we have some gameday thread people that lose their shit and others that are tongue in cheek)
But ain't anybody here that wants Mahomes traded for Jackson or Allen or Burrow or Herbert or anyone else.
They just want to know why he's not playing at the same level he was playing at over the last season+. And I get it, you're super eager to make excuses for him.
But he's had personnel and problems around him very very similar to this in the past and was a damn monster in spite of it. 2022 PM is what this PM should be able to do.
And he's not.
The question is simply 'why?'
Mahomes’ QBR is equivalent to what it was in 2021 and higher than it was last season. The team is 9-0 and the offence is efficient (particularly when it matters at winning time).
I’m just failing to see any problem here. Are we really so bored with success that we have to manufacture a story that there is some kind of issue with the best and most valuable player in the sport because he missed a throw or two?
[Reply]