- Early career production - Dynamic threat downfield & after the catch - Elite speed & start-stop ability - Fluid mover w/ good route running chops - Ball tracking is A+
Not entirely sure why the vibe isn't higher when talking about him in the WR class. pic.twitter.com/dv3JjdyZgh
I'll write something fresh about Worthy tomorrow morning now that he's a Chief to lay out how he's more than speed, but for now here's an excerpt from article linked in the below tweet... https://t.co/EcW7QtUrFFpic.twitter.com/811ahCEfMS
Originally Posted by Iconic:
Honestly can't stop thinking about the first half of the Bills game... they need to force feed this kid targets nonstop into the playoffs. He is more than a go route pony and has now shown it.
This could be the offenses golden ticket and we got a couple of trash games on the schedule to test it out.
Seeing that confidence build in him and the chemistry with Mahomes was so nice. Probably a big reason the loss hardly bothered me.
We are on a similar timeline as was with Rashee Rice if they can keep building. Not that I expect Worthy to be the #1 target in the playoffs no matter what, that's gonna be Kelce and Hopkins. But if they can keep cranking out 60-80 yards and many TDs, let's roll. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
Perine had 50 receptions for 455 yards last year with the broncos. This season he has 174 so far on pace for 296.
That makes zero sense. We could kill 2 birds with one stone using him more. We would get a lot more production from our passing game and most importantly, if you run a few RB screens behind the pass rush, it forces the pass rushers to be less aggressive which helps out the line and in turn allows you to run longer developing downfield plays.
It's the kind of stuff that makes me want to accept the "they're saving things for the playoffs" cope. But...who the **** saves RB screens lol.
Yeah, I was excited when they signed Perine because of his receiving skills. They're either saving him for the playoffs or the coaches believe he's got nothing left in the tank. [Reply]