Originally Posted by milkshock:
He means the problem is allowing 24 to the Bucs, not our offense.
And it is a problem. What’s going to happen when we face decent receivers ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s early over here in Cali, still asleep lol.
Eh, I’m not too worried about the defense. Spags will get his guys ready. It was also raining, so of course there was going to be sloppy football. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
It’s an efficiency based offense. They have long, long drives. They are excellent situationally. They still shoulda had AT least 7 more easy points (Worthy miscue).
That was a good offensive showing last night to my eye.
Read again. Wasn't talking about the offense. The defense simply can't allow Faker with zero weapons to drive like that at the end. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
Read again. Wasn't talking about the offense. The defense simply can't allow Faker with zero weapons to drive like that at the end.
Ahh yeah my bad. Wasn’t a good night. They had our pressures blocked up well and Baker was accurate. Reminded me of Green Bay last year. [Reply]
If he doesn’t cost much we should do it. I’m tired of seeing Justin Watson get starter snaps and Worthy isnt ready yet
Are you saying we shouldn't trust Watson? Because is seems clear to me that Mahomes trusts Watson and always has.
Watson made some good plays....and is what we need him to be. Not sure you are saying you don't like Watson, but I think he is a good complimentary guy that plays his role well. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
Ahh yeah my bad. Wasn’t a good night. They had our pressures blocked up well and Baker was accurate. Reminded me of Green Bay last year.
McDuffie having a seemingly bad (for him) night didn't help matters, either. [Reply]